Shaky Gravity Boost

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Earthquakes jostle matter within the crust, thereby modifying local gravity. But because of imprecise, unstable instruments, scientists could monitor these changes only with the aid of long records before and after quakes. Japanese investigators have devised a much quicker method. They monitored how superconducting balls respond to gravity while trapped floating in ultrastable magnetic fields generated by superconducting coils. After accounting for the separate pulls of the sun, moon, air, ocean and the earth's rotation, the researchers detected a permanent increase in gravity roughly a half billionth that of the earth's pull southeast off the coast of Hokkaido, the epicenter of the magnitude 8 Tokachi-oki quake in 2003. The results, in the October 15 Science, agree with theoretical predictions, suggesting that superconducting gravimeters can help satellites chart the earth's gravity to map changes in polar ice cap thickness, seawater levels, atmospheric density and planetary geology.

Charles Q. Choi is a frequent contributor to Scientific American. His work has also appeared in The New York Times, Science, Nature, Wired, and LiveScience, among others. In his spare time, he has traveled to all seven continents.

More by Charles Q. Choi
Scientific American Magazine Vol 292 Issue 1This article was published with the title “Shaky Gravity Boost” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 292 No. 1 (), p. 28
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0105-28b

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe