Sharklike Fossil Fills In the Jaws Family Tree

A new analysis of an ancient specimen helps to flesh out the marine predators’ evolution 

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Science knows very little about shark evolution. This is partly because “cartilage is a funny tissue,” says John Maisey, a paleontologist at the American Museum of Natural History in New York City. Shark bodies are largely made of this firm, white connective substance—which does not fossilize well. For hundreds of years scientists have only been able to guess that sharks probably had some bony fish ancestors. But now, using a CT scanner to evaluate the only known fossil of an ancient fish called Doliodus problematicus, Maisey and his colleagues may have found a crucial missing piece in the shark origin puzzle.

“Shark skeletons are among the rarest [finds],” Maisey explains. The 400-million-year-old Doliodus skeleton was discovered in the mid-1990s in the Canadian province of New Brunswick. Yet it was not until 2014 that advanced CT technology allowed Maisey to see that the specimen had sharklike jaws and tooth arrangements. Earlier this year he and his colleagues reported in American Museum Novitates that it also had a row of spines along its back and pelvic fins that match a much older and well-studied class of extinct bony fishes called acanthodians. In other words, Doliodus bears features of both the older bony fishes and modern sharks.

“This is a significant discovery,” says Michael Coates, an evolutionary biologist at the University of Chicago, who was not involved in the study. The findings support the idea that acanthodians “represent a missing chunk of early shark evolution.” Thanks to Maisey's find, researchers will now have to go back and study acanthodians in a whole new light.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe