New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Shifting Origins of New World's First Farmers

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Tiny crystals from the rinds of squashes and gourds are providing new information about the first farmers in the New World. Previous findings suggested that plant domestication originated in the dry highland regions of Mexico and South America about 10,000 years ago. Now research published in the current issue of the journal Science indicates that agriculture may have arisen in the lowlands of Ecuador at the same time, or even 2,000 years earlier.

Finding plant remains that survive the high temperatures, rainfall, and mold common in the tropics is extremely difficult. Instead, scientists study so-called phytoliths, hardened pieces of silica formed by plants as protection against herbivores and pathogens. The size of the phytoliths is an indicator of their source plant's history: wild Cucurbita plants (which include squash and gourds), for example, have significantly smaller inclusions than their farmed counterparts have. Dolores R. Piperno of the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute and Karen E. Stothert of the University of Texas at San Antonio collected fossilized Cucurbita phytoliths from archaeological sites in southwestern Ecuador. By comparing the samples to 150 wild and domesticated modern species from 100 different locations, the researchers determined that gourds dating to between 10,000 and 12,000 years ago were cultivated

Cucurbita plants, which are rich in oil and protein, were a favorite among the earliest farmers in various parts of both South America and Mesoamerica. The authors conclude that in addition to possibly pushing back the date of plant domestication, their findings also suggest that there was no single center of agricultural origins in South America.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe