New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Shorebird Learns Long Migration Routes

Cory’s shearwaters forge their own paths over the sea

Cory’s shearwater.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

In habitats across the planet, animals periodically drop everything to walk, fly or swim to a new locale—and lightweight tracking technology has given biologists their best-ever understanding of these seasonal treks. Wildlife such as whales and geese learn migration routes by following their parents and other older counterparts. Others, including small songbirds, inherit the distance and direction of their migration deep within their genetic code. And some animals use a combination of genetics and culture to guide their migration.

Another group of migrators does not quite fit either model, and researchers have only recently started to figure out how they find their way. Take the Cory's shearwater, an oceangoing petrel species that migrates over the Atlantic every year. The young do not migrate with their parents, so culture cannot explain their journeys. And the exact routes vary wildly from individual to individual, making genetics equally unlikely.

Cory's shearwaters are long-lived, rarely breeding successfully before age nine. This leaves an opening for learning and practice to develop their migration patterns. Researchers call this the “exploration-refinement” mechanism, and until now it has been largely hypothetical because of difficulties inherent in tracking migratory animals' movements over many seasons.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


But a team of researchers has done exactly that by affixing small geolocators to more than 150 of the birds aged four to nine. The group found that younger birds traveled longer distances, for longer periods, and had more diverse routes than older birds. “We actually finally have evidence of [the exploration-refinement] hypothesis for migratory birds,” says Letizia Campioni, a biologist at Instituto Universitário in Lisbon, who led the study. This is the first such evidence in a seabird, although earlier research has suggested that other long-lived birds might use the same strategy. The study was published in the January issue of the Journal of Animal Ecology.

Younger Cory's shearwaters are capable of flying just as fast as the adults—but they do not, suggesting that juveniles do more exploring, which gradually fades as they mature and settle into a preferred route.

Although it may seem less efficient than other strategies, “exploration refinement could be beneficial to birds and other organisms in a rapidly changing world due to unpredictable anthropogenic changes,” says Barbara Frei, director of the McGill Bird Observatory, who was not involved in the study. “It might be safer to repeat a behavior that was recently successful than to rely on cues that were perfected long ago but might no longer be safe.”

Jason G. Goldman is a science journalist based in Los Angeles. He has written about animal behavior, wildlife biology, conservation, and ecology for Scientific American, Los Angeles magazine, the Washington Post, the Guardian, the BBC, Conservation magazine, and elsewhere. He contributes to Scientific American's "60-Second Science" podcast, and is co-editor of Science Blogging: The Essential Guide (Yale University Press). He enjoys sharing his wildlife knowledge on television and on the radio, and often speaks to the public about wildlife and science communication.

More by Jason G. Goldman
Scientific American Magazine Vol 322 Issue 5This article was published with the title “Migration Learning” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 322 No. 5 (), p. 18
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0520-18b

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe