Shortest Telomeres in Cells May Control Their Fate

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

For some time, researchers have investigated the role that telomeres¿coverings on the tips of chromosomes¿play in moderating cell growth, mutation and death. In doing so, they have generally measured the average lengths of these chromosomal caps, which are shortened each time the cell divides. But in a study published in today¿s issue of the journal Cell, Carol Greider and colleagues at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine report that it is actually the single shortest telomere in a cell that controls its fate.

The researchers bred telomerase-null mice, which have very short telomeres and lack the telomerase enzyme needed to rebuild them, with mice having active telomerase and correspondingly long telomeres. The offspring all had telomeres of intermediate length, but one-quarter also inherited telomerase and with it, the ability to rebuild their telomeres.

Greider and team found that cell mutations in the mice occurred when telomeres on only one or two chromosomes were nearly gone. "Our evidence suggests that once a telomere becomes very short, the cell recognizes it as a DNA break," Greider notes. "Broken DNA commonly signals normal cells to arrest or die as a protection against chromosome rearrangement and cancer." Most importantly, the offspring without telomerase experienced cell death equivalent to that of their short-telomered parent, despite having a longer average telomere length.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The scientists also determined that telomerase saved cells in the second-generation mice by lengthening only the shortest telomeres instead of acting on them all indiscriminately. The enzyme also seemed to save itself extra work: it lengthened the telomeres just enough to restore function and no more. The findings, Greider says, represent "a fundamental change in the way that most scientists think about telomere length."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe