Shrinking Circuits with Water

Semiconductor manufacturers are giving their products a dousing in the name of faster, smaller, cheaper

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Physicist Giovanni Battista Amiciplaced a drop of liquid on a specimen in his Florence laboratory, improving the quality of the image seen through his microscope's eyepiece. Now, 165 years later, the global semiconductor industry is just getting around to adopting Amici's innovative technique.

The decision to baptize chips under a thin liquid stratum will allow the making of circuits with features that measure the breadth of a virus. Such a retro solution--the 19th century meets the 21st--also serves as a fitting commemoration of the 40th anniversary of the semiconductor industry's most influential technical paper, a treatise by Intel co-founder Gordon E. Moore entitled "Cramming More Components onto Integrated Circuits." Moore's prediction that the number of transistors on a chip would double every 12 months (later revised to every 24 months) transmuted from mere forecast into ironclad edict, the equivalent of a law of nature that ordains that the industry will suffer some unspecified but assuredly grievous injury if chip power does not continue to grow in exponential leaps every two years.

Gary Stix is the former senior editor of mind and brain topics at Scientific American.

More by Gary Stix
Scientific American Magazine Vol 293 Issue 1This article was published with the title “Shrinking Circuits with Water” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 293 No. 1 ()
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican072005-23Cd58Lvb6iZD6fpdzaWpc

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe