New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Sight for Bee Eyes

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Honeybees can learn to recognize human faces. Adrian G. Dyer of the University of Cambridge and his colleagues trained the bees by getting the insects to associate black-and-white mug shots with a sweet reward (a sucrose drink) or with a bitter punishment (a quinine solution). During tests, which offered no reward or punishment, smarter bees did not bumble the task. They hovered two to three inches from the photographs before correctly landing near the “reward face” 80 to 90 percent of the time. They also performed well when novel and stick-figure faces were part of the selection. The results demonstrate that face recognition, which might seem to be a sophisticated neural ability, does not need much brainpower—bees have less than 0.01 percent the neurons that humans do. Generating the buzz is the December 15, 2005, Journal of Experimental Biology.

Philip Yam is the managing editor of ScientificAmerican.com, responsible for the overall news content online. He began working at the magazine in 1989, first as a copyeditor and then as a features editor specializing in physics. He is the author of The Pathological Protein: Mad Cow, Chronic Wasting and Other Prion Diseases.

More by Philip Yam
Scientific American Magazine Vol 294 Issue 2This article was published with the title “Sight for Bee Eyes” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 294 No. 2 (), p. 28
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0206-28d

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe