New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Sightings of "Newborn" Galaxies Reveal a Fecund Universe

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The first data returned by NASA's Galaxy Evolution Explorer spacecraft (GALEX) suggests that our Universe is still quite fertile. Observations of newborn galaxies indicate that the universe is still alive with youth and not suffering from as big a decline in its galactic birthrate as previously believed.

Launched in April 2003, the spacecraft uses a telescope 50 centimeters in diameter to scan the skies for ultraviolet sources. The newly discovered galaxies are 10 times as bright in the ultraviolet range as the Milky Way. Such brightness is a sign of violent star formation and exploding supernovae, which is in turn an indication of youthful galaxies. "Now we can study the ancestors to galaxies much like our Milky Way in much more detail than ever before," explains project leader Tim Heckman of Johns Hopkins University. "It's like finding a living fossil in your own backyard. We thought this type of galaxy had gone extinct, but in fact newborn galaxies are alive and well in the universe."

Previous discoveries of young galaxies were located some 11 billion light-years away. GALEX's field of view, which spans a stretch of sky nearly three times the moon's diameter, surveyed thousands of galaxies before identifying nearly three dozen newborns. The new finds, just two to four billion light-years from Earth, give astronomers a close-up view of baby galaxies. A report detailing this and other early GALEX results will be published in an upcoming issue of Astrophysical Journal Letters.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe