Signs of an Ancient Supernova

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In the spring of 386 A.D., Chinese astronomers made note of a new star, most likely a supernova, in the sky near Sagittarius, as the constellation later came to be known. Its remnants¿an expanding ring of gas and particles¿were found in the 1970s and named G11.2-0.3. Now a group of Canadian researchers report that a pulsar in the area is probably left over from the historic event as well. Using NASA's Chandra X-ray Observatory, Victoria Kaspi and her colleagues at McGill University discovered that the pulsar, a neutron star originally spotted in 1997, lies at the exact geometric center of G11.2-0.3. They described their finding last week at the American Astronomical Society meeting in San Diego.

The pulsar's precise location suggests that it was created during the fourth-century explosion. If so, it is only the second such star associated with a recorded supernova: the Crab Nebula is believed to have resulted from the supernova in 1054 A.D. Based on the pulsar's spin rate of 14 times per second, scientists at the Japanese Advanced Satellite for Cosmology and Astrophysics (ASCA) estimated its age to be roughly 24,000 years old. But if it is truly 1,615 years old, as the new research suggests, then pulsars may spin more slowly than was expected. "We believe that the pulsar and the supernova remnant G11.2-0.3 are both likely to be left over from the explosion seen by the Chinese observers over 1,600 years ago," says Mallory Roberts of McGill University. "While this is exciting by itself, it also raises new questions about what we know about pulsars, especially during their infancies."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe