Silicon DNA Counters

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Image: Courtesy CRAIGHEAD GROUP Cornell University

When it comes to analyzing biomolecules such as proteins or DNA, the tried-and-true test tube can only take you so far. It is for this reason that many scientists are working to create so-called labs-on-chips and other nanoscale devices, specially engineered to sort, measure and count the various molecules of life. Such inventions might make possible, among other things, far more accurate genetic and diagnostic tests. Harold Craighead, director of the Cornell Nanobiotechnology Center, described some of his own prototypes yesterday at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in San Francisco.

The Craighead laboratory has worked on silicon-based alternatives to the organic gels used in DNA electrophoresis. The traditional technique relies on an electric field to pull fragments of DNA through the gel's tiny pores. Fragments of different lengths move at different speeds and ultimately collect in separate bands that can be photographed using fluorescent or radioactive tags. In Craighead's devices, silicon structures with tiny pores¿or forests of either columns or flat vanes¿replace the gel. These nano-sieves need not sort only DNA molecules but could also separate proteins, carbohydrates or lipids. "This will expand the methods for analyzing very small amounts of biochemicals," Craighead says, "and create new abilities unanticipated by the test-tube methods.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe