Silicon Jaws in New Microdevice Grip Individual Red Blood Cells

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Imagine a mini assembly line along which doctors could tweak, modify or correct malfunctions within millions of individual cells in minutes. Such an invention would vastly expand the current multibillion-dollar microfluidic device industry, which currently produces instruments that can analyze individual cells but not alter them. Now researchers at Sandia National Laboratories have taken an important step toward this dream. Murat Okandan, working with Paul Galambos, Sita Mani and Jay Jakubszak, has developed a mechanized microgizmo that can grip individual red blood cells between two rows of tiny silicon teeth and temporarily deform their shape. The microjaw snaps open and shut rapidly, clamping down on roughly 10 cells a second as they flow through a channel 20 microns wide.

For now, the researchers are hoping to discover if their prototype device¿for which they have applied for a patent¿actually disrupts the blood cells' membranes. To do so, they will test whether cells chewed by the microjaw can absorb a fluorescent material. But in the near future, they also plan to replace the microjaw with a hollow silicon needle, which could introduce DNA, RNA, drug molecules or proteins into living cells. In this way, the device might be used to treat or reverse the effects of gene imbalances, chemical attacks, and bacterial or viral infection within single cells, they say. "We've shown that we can create a micromachine that interacts at the scale of cells," Okandan comments. "We've created a demonstration tool with very flexible technology that we believe will enable many designs and concepts. This device itself may generate considerable interest from the agriculture or genetic engineering marketplaces."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe