New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Silkworms' Product Could Rival That of Spiders

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Spider dragline silk is one of the strongest materials known. But production of large quantities of the material for various industrial applications has been hampered by the animals' territorial nature. Now findings published today in the journal Nature suggest that silk spun by silkworms could rival the strands produced by arachnids. The key, scientists say, lies in how it is collected.

Commercial silkworm fibers are currently harvested from the finished cocoon of the silk moth, Bombyx mori. This product is less than a third as strong as a spider's dragline silk and only half as stretchy. But if the threads are extracted directly from the silkworm, these properties can be enhanced dramatically, report Zhenghong Shao of Fudan University in Shanghai and Fritz Vollrath of Oxford University. The determining factor, it seems, is the speed at which the silk is spooled as it comes out of the caterpillar's silk glands. Slow spinning produces silk that matches the stretchiness of dragline silk, whereas fast spooling makes it tougher, though not quite as tough as the spider's strands.

The researchers propose that silkworms could be a viable source of strong silk, with fewer modifications than the arachnid variety requires. (The biotech firm Nexia is currently experimenting with goats genetically engineered to produce dragline silk in their milk.) "We suggest that silkworms might be able to produce threads that compare well with spider silk by changing their spinning habits," they write, "rather than having their silk genes altered."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe