Silkworms' Product Could Rival That of Spiders

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Spider dragline silk is one of the strongest materials known. But production of large quantities of the material for various industrial applications has been hampered by the animals' territorial nature. Now findings published today in the journal Nature suggest that silk spun by silkworms could rival the strands produced by arachnids. The key, scientists say, lies in how it is collected.

Commercial silkworm fibers are currently harvested from the finished cocoon of the silk moth, Bombyx mori. This product is less than a third as strong as a spider's dragline silk and only half as stretchy. But if the threads are extracted directly from the silkworm, these properties can be enhanced dramatically, report Zhenghong Shao of Fudan University in Shanghai and Fritz Vollrath of Oxford University. The determining factor, it seems, is the speed at which the silk is spooled as it comes out of the caterpillar's silk glands. Slow spinning produces silk that matches the stretchiness of dragline silk, whereas fast spooling makes it tougher, though not quite as tough as the spider's strands.

The researchers propose that silkworms could be a viable source of strong silk, with fewer modifications than the arachnid variety requires. (The biotech firm Nexia is currently experimenting with goats genetically engineered to produce dragline silk in their milk.) "We suggest that silkworms might be able to produce threads that compare well with spider silk by changing their spinning habits," they write, "rather than having their silk genes altered."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe