Simultaneous Megafires Will Increasingly Plague the Western U.S.

The Western U.S. faces a future of fighting multiple large wildfires at once—a situation that is more difficult than handling a single blaze, even if the total acreage is similar

4 firefighters in front of fire and tree landscape

Firefighters conduct a controlled burn to defend houses against flames from the Ranch Fire, part of the Mendocino Complex Fire, as it continued to spread towards the town of Upper Lake, California on August 1, 2018.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

CLIMATEWIRE | Climate change is expected to help spark more simultaneous megafires in the western United States — a trend that could make it harder for firefighters to control the blazes.

That's according to a study published Aug. 1 in the International Journal of Wildland Fire. It projects increases in the number of simultaneous megafires — fires with a final burned area of 1,000 acres or more — in "every part of the Western USA at multiple return periods."

Simultaneous wildfires are more difficult to handle than a single wildfire, even if the total acreage is similar. That's because multiple wildfires can strain both time and resources.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


“Managing a bunch of fires is more complicated than managing a single fire, you don’t have limitless resources,” said Seth McGinnis, the study's lead author.

The study also expects there will be a longer period of time in which simultaneous megafires threaten the West.

"The length of the season of high simultaneity also increases everywhere and extends later into the year, most notably in the northern and eastern parts of the region, and especially in the Rocky Mountain" area, according to the study.

A longer season can impede wildfire suppression. Traditionally, fire officials use slow periods to set controlled fires called prescribed burns to suppress the fuel for future fires, McGinnis said. When they can't do that, the risk compounds.

In addition, states and countries often send firefighters to help out elsewhere when things are slow at home. This year, the United States sent 2,200 firefighters to Canada, one expert noted. Those exchanges, however, could become more limited as major wildfires grow more frequent.

“It’s a really difficult situation,” said Alison Cullen, a professor of environmental policy at the University of Washington and a co-author of the study. “Firefighters used to have a season when they were able to rest. That’s not happening anymore.”

Reprinted from E&E News with permission from POLITICO, LLC. Copyright 2023. E&E News provides essential news for energy and environment professionals.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe