New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Simultaneous Megafires Will Increasingly Plague the Western U.S.

The Western U.S. faces a future of fighting multiple large wildfires at once—a situation that is more difficult than handling a single blaze, even if the total acreage is similar

4 firefighters in front of fire and tree landscape

Firefighters conduct a controlled burn to defend houses against flames from the Ranch Fire, part of the Mendocino Complex Fire, as it continued to spread towards the town of Upper Lake, California on August 1, 2018.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

CLIMATEWIRE | Climate change is expected to help spark more simultaneous megafires in the western United States — a trend that could make it harder for firefighters to control the blazes.

That's according to a study published Aug. 1 in the International Journal of Wildland Fire. It projects increases in the number of simultaneous megafires — fires with a final burned area of 1,000 acres or more — in "every part of the Western USA at multiple return periods."

Simultaneous wildfires are more difficult to handle than a single wildfire, even if the total acreage is similar. That's because multiple wildfires can strain both time and resources.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


“Managing a bunch of fires is more complicated than managing a single fire, you don’t have limitless resources,” said Seth McGinnis, the study's lead author.

The study also expects there will be a longer period of time in which simultaneous megafires threaten the West.

"The length of the season of high simultaneity also increases everywhere and extends later into the year, most notably in the northern and eastern parts of the region, and especially in the Rocky Mountain" area, according to the study.

A longer season can impede wildfire suppression. Traditionally, fire officials use slow periods to set controlled fires called prescribed burns to suppress the fuel for future fires, McGinnis said. When they can't do that, the risk compounds.

In addition, states and countries often send firefighters to help out elsewhere when things are slow at home. This year, the United States sent 2,200 firefighters to Canada, one expert noted. Those exchanges, however, could become more limited as major wildfires grow more frequent.

“It’s a really difficult situation,” said Alison Cullen, a professor of environmental policy at the University of Washington and a co-author of the study. “Firefighters used to have a season when they were able to rest. That’s not happening anymore.”

Reprinted from E&E News with permission from POLITICO, LLC. Copyright 2023. E&E News provides essential news for energy and environment professionals.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe