New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

'Six Degrees of Immunization' Strategy Proposed

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In the game Six Degrees of Kevin Bacon, the actor is linked to other actors both living and dead through film appearances; most performers can be associated with Bacon in just three steps. The pastime highlights a defining characteristic of social networks: whereas most people have a few links to other people in the network, some individuals, such as Bacon, possess a large number of links. A report published in the December 12 issue of Physical Review Letters describes a vaccination strategy that exploits this phenomenon.

Reuven Cohen of Bar-Ilan University in Israel and his colleagues note that random immunization programs require that a large fraction of the population, typically 80 to 90 percent, be protected in order to stop the spread of disease. Alternatively, if enough information about the network and its connections is known, targeted immunization of the most highly connected individuals--so-called super-spreaders, who have the potential to infect a high number of people--can be effective. Unfortunately, such information is difficult to acquire. The researchers instead propose a tactic known as acquaintance immunization. In it, a percentage of the population is selected at random and asked to identify a friend. Those friends, in turn, are vaccinated. According to the team's calculations, because super-spreaders know so many people, there is a high probability that they will be named at least once. As a result, immunization of a much smaller fraction of the population can successfully halt disease transmission. In addition, the authors note that their approach "can be used even before the epidemic starts spreading, since it does not require any knowledge of the chain of infection."

The new approach could be helpful in regions in the developing world where there aren't enough vaccines to treat the entire population. In addition, Cohen and his colleagues note that the technique is relevant to other types of networks, including terrorist ones. "For terrorist networks," they write, "our findings suggest that an efficient way to disintegrate the network is to focus more on removing individuals whose name is obtained from another member of the network."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe