Skeletons of four doomed Franklin Expedition sailors identified with DNA

The latest studies bring the number of remains identified from this doomed 1845 expedition to six of the 129 who set out to the Arctic

A black and white ink illustration of the HMS Terror trapped in ice

API / Contributor / Getty Images

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Researchers have used DNA from the skeletal remains of four members of the ill-fated 1845 Franklin expedition to explore the Arctic to identify the dead for the first time.

The expedition was a multiyear effort to find the Northwest Passage—an ice-free path connecting the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans through the Arctic. Led by British explorer John Franklin, the expedition involved two ships, the HMS Erebus and the HMS Terror. Over the course of their voyage north, both vessels became trapped in ice off King William Island in the Canadian Arctic. Franklin himself died in 1847. And in 1848 the remaining crew—105 men—decided to try to walk across the sea ice from the island to the Canadian mainland. They all perished.

“It must have been horrible,” says Douglas Stenton , an archaeologist at the University of Waterloo in Ontario. “It was probably –30 [degrees] Celsius [–22 degrees Fahrenheit], and these men were not healthy after three years in the Arctic.”


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Denton is lead author of a new study in the Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports that identifies three of the dead found on King William Island: William Orren, an able seaman; David Young, a first-class boy seaman, class, who had been 17 when he signed up for the voyage; and John Bridgens, a subordinate officers’ steward. All were from the Erebus and had joined the expedition in London.

University of Waterloo archaeologist Douglas Stenton excavating remains at Erebus Bay in 2013. This cache of bones included those of the newly-identified John Bridgens.

University of Waterloo archaeologist Douglas Stenton excavating remains at Erebus Bay in 2013. This cache of bones included those of the newly-identified John Bridgens.

University of Waterloo

The remains of the fourth man were found farther south, and Denton says that a forthcoming study in the journal Polar Record identifies him as Harry Peglar, who sailed on the HMS Terror. All the identifications were made by comparing the DNA extracted from the remains to that of living relatives.

Both the HMS Erebus and Terror were heavily reinforced with iron plating and were equipped with steam engines for power and extra provisions. But a note from officers of the ships’ that was found in a stone cairn stated that they became trapped in ice in late 1846 and that Franklin and 23 others had died by April 1848, when the march south was attempted by the survivors. (Scientific American in in 1849 published an article about a contemplated effort to try and find the missing men, and then, 1880 published an account of a search expedition to find the then-presumed deceased remains the crew, which you can read here, )

The remains of at least 23 members of the doomed expedition have now been found, and the same researchers previously identified two of them through DNA. The latest studies bring the number of those positively identified so far to six.

“These three new identifications ... allow new insights into what happened shortly after the survivors deserted the Erebus and Terror,” the researchers write in the Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports study.

Tom Metcalfe is a freelance journalist who is based in London. Metcalfe writes mainly about science, space, archaeology, Earth and the oceans. He has also written for Live Science, the BBC, NBC News, National Geographic, Air & Space and many others.

More by Tom Metcalfe

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe