Skin Cells, Pollen Contribute to Air Pollution

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


When modeling climate, scientists must account for a large number of variables. One of the most challenging is the effect of small particulates suspended in the atmosphere, which can either reflect or absorb incoming radiation from the sun and thus alter its influence. The most common types of aerosols are soot, ash and other man-made particles as well as naturally derived dust and salt. Until now, plants and animals have been considered a small source of particulate pollution. But a new study suggests that up to 25 percent of aerosols worldwide could be coming from biological sources, including fur, skin, pollen and bacteria.

Ruprecht Jaenicke of the Institute of Atmospheric Physics in Mainz, Germany, gathered air samples from around the globe at different times of the year and analyzed their content. He found evidence of a variety of cellular and protein particles--from dandruff to algae, bacteria to viruses--injected directly into the air. There was no identifiable annual cycle in the total amount of these bioaerosols, contrary to expectations that concentrations in the spring or summer should be higher than those present during the winter months. The proportions of different biological compounds did demonstrate variability, however. Pollen is most abundant in the spring, for example, whereas the amount of decaying cellular matter peaks in winter.

Jaenicke's report, published today in the journal Science, concludes that the biosphere is a major source of primary aerosol particles ranging in size from tens of nanometers to millimeters in size. Because they can influence cloud formation and trigger precipitation, understanding their global distribution is important, he notes, because "the meteorological relevance of cellular particles could be high."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe