New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

'Sky Chemistry' Leads To Greener Way To Make Plastic

Nylon production creates a greenhouse gas but combining ozone and UV light eliminates it

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Mimicking the breakdown of atmospheric organic compounds has led to a cleaner way to make a key nylon raw material.

Today, adipic acid is produced by opening cyclohexane using large volumes of nitric acid, a process that emits the ozone-depleting greenhouse gas nitrous oxide. But Kuo Chu Hwang and Arunachalam Sagadevan from the National Tsing Hua University in Taiwan have discovered that ozone and UV light provide an effective alternative. 'Our process is far greener, milder and more environmentally friendly,' Hwang tells Chemistry World.

Industrial adipic acid production first oxidises cyclohexane to cyclohexanol and cyclohexanone at high temperatures and pressures. This step's yield can be less than 10%, a significant limitation. Secondly, nitric acid oxidation opens up these ring structures, completely converting them into straight-chain adipic acid.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Nitrous oxide released from this process accounts for 5–8% of all annual human-related emissions of the gas. As well as being the dominant human-emitted ozone depleter, nitrous oxide is the third most important greenhouse gas. Cleaning up adipic acid production could therefore have clear environmental benefits—but so far all efforts have been too costly.

Hwang and Sagadevan came upon their route by chance, in exploring how ozone and UV light oxidise and break down organic compounds in the atmosphere. 'It occurred to me to oxidise cyclohexane, which contains only unactivated C–H bonds, this way,' Hwang says. 'In organic chemistry C–H bond functionalisation of hydrocarbons is extremely difficult, and considered a Holy Grail.'

The physical chemists bubbled ozone through neat cyclohexane while shining UV light on it at room temperature and pressure. After a few hours, adipic acid precipitated. They optimised the cyclohexane to adipic acid conversion yield to 75% by getting a brighter lamp, letting the reaction run longer and adding weak acid. The method also worked well on a variety of other ring structures.

Yale University’s Nilay Hazari calls the C–H bond oxidation method ‘elegant’, and asserts that it could result in improved industrial adipic acid synthesis methods. While Hwang is yet to work out a cost comparison for the new route, he notes ozone can be made cheaply from oxygen in the air. His next step will be increasing the scale from 6.5ml currently, including bringing in chemical engineers to design and optimise larger scale reactors. Though Hwang says 'many things have to be overcome and optimised' he is 'optimistic' about the prospects.

This article is reproduced with permission from Chemistry World. The article was first published on December 22, 2014.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe