New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Slumbering Fruit Flies Shed Light on Genetics of Sleep Needs

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


From sleep hogs to early birds, people have a wide range of shut-eye needs. Now researchers report in the journal Nature that they have identified a single gene in fruit flies that determines how much rest the creatures require. Because humans carry a similar gene, the findings may shed light on the mechanisms and functions of sleep.

The ability to get by on very little sleep is a trait that seems to run in families, suggesting it may have a genetic component. To test that idea, Giulio Tononi and his colleagues at the University of Wisconsin-Madison spent four years studying the slumber habits of thousands of fruit flies. They discovered a line of flies that slept a third as much as regular flies did without any impairment in their performance on a variety of tasks. Dubbed minisleepers, these flies did experience one drawback, however: they tended to die sooner than the control flies did.

Genetic analysis of the minisleep flies revealed that they had a single amino acid mutation on the Shaker gene, which regulates a potassium ion channel into cells. In flies with the mutation, formation of a functional ion channel is disrupted. Potassium channels affect electrical activity in neurons, among other things, and the results suggest that changes in the ion's concentration could affect sleep in humans. Remarks study co-author Chiara Cirelli: "This research offers the possibility of developing a new class of compounds that could affect potassium channels in the brain rather than other brain chemical systems targeted currently."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe