Slumbering Fruit Flies Shed Light on Genetics of Sleep Needs

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


From sleep hogs to early birds, people have a wide range of shut-eye needs. Now researchers report in the journal Nature that they have identified a single gene in fruit flies that determines how much rest the creatures require. Because humans carry a similar gene, the findings may shed light on the mechanisms and functions of sleep.

The ability to get by on very little sleep is a trait that seems to run in families, suggesting it may have a genetic component. To test that idea, Giulio Tononi and his colleagues at the University of Wisconsin-Madison spent four years studying the slumber habits of thousands of fruit flies. They discovered a line of flies that slept a third as much as regular flies did without any impairment in their performance on a variety of tasks. Dubbed minisleepers, these flies did experience one drawback, however: they tended to die sooner than the control flies did.

Genetic analysis of the minisleep flies revealed that they had a single amino acid mutation on the Shaker gene, which regulates a potassium ion channel into cells. In flies with the mutation, formation of a functional ion channel is disrupted. Potassium channels affect electrical activity in neurons, among other things, and the results suggest that changes in the ion's concentration could affect sleep in humans. Remarks study co-author Chiara Cirelli: "This research offers the possibility of developing a new class of compounds that could affect potassium channels in the brain rather than other brain chemical systems targeted currently."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe