Small Genetic Change Makes Flu Virus Far More Deadly

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In 1997, a particularly lethal form of the influenza virus swept through Hong Kong, killing one in three of the people it infected. New research on this deadly strain, dubbed H5N1, has revealed how it differs from more benign flus. The frightening answer is not much. "We have found that a limited number of very tiny genetic changes in a specific gene, one called PB2, can have a big effect on how potent the influenza virus is," Yoshihiro Kawaoka of the University of Wisconsin-Madison says. "Because the influenza virus constantly mutates, and because only a few changes can make a non-pathogenic virus highly pathogenic, we should assume that an outbreak of any new strain or subtype is potentially dangerous to humans."

Kawaoka and colleagues, who publish their findings today in Science, tested samples of H5N1 in mice, which respond to the virus much as humans do. Based on the lab animals' reactions, they divided the samples into two groups: highly lethal and relatively benign strains. Next they genetically engineered influenza viruses from scratch and started swapping into them one by one genes from the lethal and harmless viruses. In this way, they narrowed in on the key difference that made strains of H5N1 so dangerous¿namely a single change in an RNA unit of the PB2 gene.

Scientists believe the PB2 gene may encode an enzyme that helps the virus force host cells to crank out more virus particles. "We don't know if the mutation we studied is involved in that process," Kawaoka adds, "but our next step will be to find out."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe