Petite Pictures: The 20 Microscopic Photo Competition Prizewinners

Putting the very small on the big stage, the 35th annual Nikon Small World Competition awards top images

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

Microscopes have been around for some 400 years, and today they are even accessible via customized cell phones. The act of peering into a microscope of any power can open a whole world of life and beauty that exists right under (or in) our noses. And to capture that rare view for reproduction can also prove to be an art form in itself.

The ability to snap an image seen through an optical microscope—whether it's via fluorescence, polarized-light, dark-field, confocal, deconvolution or other techniques—has brought researchers and novices alike to the intersection of art and science. Since 1974 Nikon has recognized the year's best photomicrographs—pictures taken on a miniscule scale. Here are the top 20 winners of this year's Nikon Small World Photomicrography Competition.

View a Slide Show of the 20 Winning Images from under the Microscope

From thousands of entries, four judges (Gary Borisy, director and CEO of Marine Biological Laboratory in Woods Hole, Mass.; photographer Charles Krebs; Jamie Shreeve, science editor at National Geographic; and journalist Clive Thompson) selected the 20 winners. A popular winner is also chosen via a vote on the contest Web site. This year's popular winner, seen here, is by Dennis Breitsprecher of Hannover, Germany. He captured, at 63 times life-size, fluorescent actin bundles as they grow from the surface of coated beads with an in vitro total internal reflection fluorescence microscope (TIRFM).

Winners from past years are on tour throughout North America or can be seen here.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American