New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

'Smart' Silicon Dust Could Help Screen for Chemical Weapons

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


One of the largest obstacles to successfully responding to an attack with biological or chemical weapons is detecting the offending agent in time to stop its propagation. To that end, new findings published online this week by the journal Nature Materials could help. In a paper from the October 1 issue, scientists report the development of dust-size silicon particles that could be used to detect chemical and biological agents from a distance using a laser light source.

In order to fabricate their "smart" silicon crystals, Fr¿d¿rique Cunin and his colleagues at the University of California, San Diego, modified existing technology used to make computer chips. "The idea is that you can have something that's as small as a piece of dust with some intelligence built into it so that it could be inconspicuously stuck to paint on a wall or to the side of a truck or dispersed into a cloud of gas to detect toxic chemicals or biological materials," co-author Michael J. Sailor explains. The team first laid down nanometer-thick films that react to specific chemicals on silicon wafers and then broke the wafers up into particles having a diameter of just a few microns. "Since the particles can be encoded for millions of possible reactions," Sailor says, "it's possible to test for the presence of thousands of chemicals at the same time." The particles emit a specific wavelength of light--which can be read using a laser similar to a grocery store scanner--when they encounter an agent for which they are encoded. So far, the researchers have succeeded in identifying chemicals from nearly 20 meters away. Their goal, Sailor says, is to increase that distance to at least one kilometer.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe