Smog Will Choke Crops If Climate Plan Is Scrubbed

Several U.S. states have adopted Obama’s Clean Power Plan, but legal threats to it could result in ongoing crop losses as smog accumulates

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Nearly 20 U.S. states have started implementing former president Barack Obama's Clean Power Plan, which places limits on carbon dioxide emissions from power plants in an effort to reduce the impacts of climate change. The plan has been in legal limbo for the past year. Yet scientists have now calculated another outcome of the policy: harm to crop yields if the plan is scrubbed. Along with carbon pollution, coal-fired power plants spew pollutants that form ground-level ozone, or what we know as smog. The contribution of smog to increased rates of asthma and premature deaths was already known. The new research estimates the extent to which smog, under air-pollution policies in place before the Clean Power Plan, would limit production in 2020 of four major crops: corn, cotton, potatoes and soybeans.

Led by environmental engineer Shannon L. Capps, now at Drexel University, the team also sketched the extent to which those crop production losses would shrink under three nationwide counterscenarios. One improved the efficiency of individual power plants. Another modeled a policy similar to the Obama plan, setting state CO2 emissions goals for the electricity sector. A third established a tax on carbon emissions, under which emissions fell the most. But the greatest drop in smog-forming pollutants—and greatest gains in crop yields—came from policies such as the Clean Power Plan.

Credit: Amanda Montañez; Source: “Estimating Potential Productivity Cobenefits for Crops and Trees from Reduced Ozone with U.S. Coal Power Plant Standards,” by Shannon L. Capps et al., in Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 121, No. 24; December 27, 2016

Scientific American Magazine Vol 316 Issue 4This article was published with the title “A Crimp on Crops” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 316 No. 4 (), p. 21
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0417-21

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe