New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Smoke from Australia’s Bushfires Killed Hundreds

Exposure to particulate matter led to heart and lung problems for thousands

Residents watch a large bushfire as seen from Bargo, 150km southwest of Sydney, on December 19, 2019. 

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Smoke from Australia’s disastrous bush fires killed hundreds of people and sent thousands to hospitals and emergency rooms, according to a new study.

The estimated death toll does not include fatalities resulting directly from the flames that spread across much of eastern Australia late last year.

A research letter made public yesterday in the Medical Journal of Australia finds that at least 417 people died from smoke inhalation.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Bush fire smoke also sent over 3,000 people to hospitals for cardiac and respiratory problems and forced more than 1,300 to emergency rooms for asthma attacks.

“The calculation does not include direct injuries or fatalities from the fire fronts,” said Fay Johnston, a researcher at the University of Tasmania. “We used known relationships between air pollution and increases in the health conditions and deaths to arrive at our estimate.”

The unprecedented bush fire season has been linked to global warming as record heat and dry conditions preceded the outbreak. The study suggests that rising temperatures are having a profound impact on the health of the country’s population.

More aggressive adaptation measures in Australia are required to protect the public from future climate-related disasters, the researchers argue.

“Smoke is just one of many problems that will intensify with the increasing frequency and severity of major bushfires associated with climate change,” the authors wrote. “Expanded and diversified approaches to bushfire mitigation and adaptation to living in an increasingly hot and fire-prone country are urgently needed.”

The research team, composed of scholars from the Australian states of Tasmania and New South Wales, says the spike in deaths and hospitalizations in regions affected by smoke can be mainly attributed to fine particulate matter. The highest level of particulate matter exposure recorded during the fire emergency exceeded the historic mean value by more than 14 times, the paper notes.

The authors caution that their study does not include data for the entire country, only for four states on Australia’s east coast.

Reprinted from Climatewire with permission from E&E News. E&E provides daily coverage of essential energy and environmental news at www.eenews.net.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe