Snow Algae Absorb Greenhouse Gas

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The unicellular alga Chlamydomonas nivalis leaves its mark on snowfields with a telltale pinkish hue. The red algae typically live at altitudes higher than 2,500 meters and temperatures below freezing. Despite such harsh conditions and correspondingly high radiation levels, C. nivalis can remove carbon dioxide from its surroundings through photosynthesis. Indeed, scientists report this week in the online edition of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences that "gas-exchange from snow-algae-covered areas might represent a small but significant global carbon sink not previously noted, because summer snowfields cover significant areas of the Earth."

William E. Williams, a professor of biology at St. Mary¿s College of Maryland, and his colleagues studied patches of snow containing C. nivalis in the Snowy Range of the Rocky Mountains. The scientists assembled a shallow Plexiglass chamber containing sensors for tracking photosynthesis and took measurements in early July three years in a row (see image). They found that the bacteria absorbed carbon dioxide from both the soil and the air when exposed to the ambient light of their surroundings. By filtering the natural light, the team also determined that C. nivalis absorbs the greenhouse gas more efficiently in red light than in white, blue or green light because of its own coloring. The organisms react to varying light levels in a manner similar to that of the leaves of higher plants. Although the findings are preliminary, they suggest that photosynthesis in a square meter of snow could soak up five grams of carbon each year, and that "summer snowfields can be surprisingly productive."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe