Snow Melt May Have Carved Martian Gullies

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

The Mars Global Surveyor (MGS) first caught the Red Planet's mysterious gullies on camera in 2000. Since then, numerous explanations have been proposed for the erosion--which marks the edges of craters and cliff sides on Mars--including seeping groundwater and pressurized flowing liquid water or carbon dioxide. Now a paper published online this week by the journal Nature suggests that water from melting snow packs could be the culprit.

Using images from both NASA's Mars Odyssey spacecraft and the MGS as a guide, Philip R. Christensen of Arizona State University theorizes that water was transported from the poles toward the mid-latitudes when the planet's axis was tilted closer to the sun. The resulting water-rich snow layer formed there later began to melt as Mars's axis moved farther away from the sun. This melting yielded gully-carving liquid water that flowed beneath an insulating layer of snow. (The image above, taken by the MGS, shows numerous gullies on the wall of a Martian crater. The arrow points to a remnant of a snowpack.) According to the model, the trenches were etched over a period of 5,000 years approximately 100,000 years ago.

The new hypothesis does not yet close the book on Mars's mysterious gullies. But one of its strengths, Christensen notes, is that it can explain the formation of gullies in strange, isolated places where it would be particularly hard for groundwater to seep to the surface. "The suggestion put forward for the processes that gave rise to the gully formation is a plausible one, and I think it's the most consistent explanation with the observations so far," comments Bruce Jakosky of the University of Colorado, Boulder. "It's not a proven idea yet, but it's one we can explore over the next couple of years. I think we'll see a lot of attention focused on it."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American