So Much Rock, So Little Gravity

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Image: NEAR

Now that scientists have gotten a good look at the asteroid 433 Eros (right), they're more confused than ever: gravity on this tiny, 21-mile-long body should be so low that a ball thrown from the surface would escape into space. But pictures sent back by NASA's Near Earth Asteroid Rendezvous (NEAR) spacecraft show that Eros--which has probably been banging around our solar system since its beginning--is home to lots of little craters and big piles of rubble. "Intuition and calculation tell you that most of the debris produced in a collision would have escaped," says Joseph Veverka of Cornell University," but the surface is full of it."

Veverka, principal investigator on NEAR's multi-spectral imager and infrared spectrometer, describes the Eros mystery in today's issue of Science, which includes three additional reports from other NEAR teams studying the asteroid. "We simply don't understand this," Veverka says, offering what he thinks are two "equally bizarre" possibilities. "One is that ... somehow the debris gets thrown out at very low speeds" and so cannot escape even Eros's gravitational pull. "Or the ejected material ends up in the same orbit as Eros, and over time the asteroid runs back into its own debris and gathers it up."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe