Soft-Drink Cans Focus Sound Waves to a Point, Beating Diffraction Limit

To focus sound to a point, all you need is a thirst for fizzy drinks.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

By Jon Cartwright of Nature magazine

Sound, like light, can be tricky to manipulate on small scales. Try to focus it to a point much smaller than one wavelength and the waves bend uncontrollably--a phenomenon known as the diffraction limit. But now, a group of physicists in France has shown how to beat the acoustic diffraction limit--and all it needs is a bunch of soft-drink cans.

Scientists have attempted to overcome the acoustic diffraction limit before, but not using such everyday apparatus. The key to controlling and focusing sound is to look beyond normal waves to 'evanescent' waves, which exist very close to an object's surface. Evanescent waves can reveal details smaller than a wavelength, but they are hard to capture because they peter out so quickly. To amplify them so that they become detectable, scientists have resorted to using advanced man-made 'metamaterials' that bend sound and light in exotic ways.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Some acoustic metamaterials have been shown to guide and focus sounds waves to points that are much smaller than a wavelength in size. However, according to Geoffroy Lerosey, a physicist at the Langevin Institute of Waves and Images at the Graduate School of Industrial Physics and Chemistry in Paris (ESPCI ParisTech), no one has yet been able to focus sound beyond the diffraction limit away from a surface, in the 'far field'. "Without being too enthusiastic, I can say [our work] is the first experimental demonstration of far-field focusing of sound that beats the diffraction limit," Lerosey says.

Soda sound

Lerosey and his colleagues took a similar approach to an experiment they performed in 2007 and later described theoretically for electromagnetic waves. The group generated audible sound from a ring of computer speakers surrounding the acoustic 'lens': a seven-by-seven array of empty soft-drink cans. Because air is free to move inside and around the cans, they oscillate together like joined-up organ pipes, generating a cacophony of resonance patterns. Crucially, many of the resonances emanate from the can openings, which are much smaller than the wavelength of the sound wave, and so have a similar nature to evanescent waves.

To focus the sound, the trick is to capture these waves at any point on the array. For this, Lerosey and his team used a method known as time reversal: they recorded the sound above any one can in the resonating array, and then played the recording backwards through the speakers. Thanks to a quirk of wave physics, the resultant waveform cancels out the resonance patterns everywhere--except above the chosen can.

After the playback, the can continues to resonate by itself, scattering out the sound energy left inside. Normal waves scatter efficiently, so they disappear quickly. However, the evanescent-like waves are less efficient at scattering, and take roughly a second to make it out of the can--a prolonged emission that allows the build up of a narrow, focused spot. In fact, Lerosey's group found that the focused spot could be as small as just 1/25th of one wavelength, way beyond the diffraction limit. The results are due to be published in Physical Review Letters.

Beyond the limit?

There is some debate among acoustic scientists as to whether this is the first time anyone has truly beaten the acoustic diffraction limit. Mechanical engineer Nicholas Fang at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Cambridge thinks that the results are a first because the focal point is away from the lens, in the far field. But John Page, a physicist at the University of Manitoba in Winnipeg, Canada, who has published evidence for sub-wavelength focusing in the near field, disagrees. "Super-resolution is super-resolution, no matter in what regime it is obtained," he says.

Still, Page calls the Lerosey group's work "a very important accomplishment" and believes it could find many applications, such as feeding energy to tiny electromechanical devices so they can operate.

Lerosey himself thinks that the simplicity of the apparatus is what bodes so well for applications. "To me, this experiment says, 'we can do it easily, even with Coke cans,' and it opens a door."

This article is reproduced with permission from the magazine Nature. The article was first published on July 8, 2011.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe