New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Survey Predicts Tolerance to Chemotherapy for Older Patients

The answers to eleven questions help individuals aged 65 years and older determine the risk of a severe to potentially fatal reaction to chemotherapy

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The elderly—especially the very old—are the fastest-growing group of cancer patients in the U.S., according to an article written by Claudia Wallis in the December 2014 Scientific American. Determining which older patients can benefit from chemotherapy—and which ones lack the resilience to tolerate it—have therefore become increasingly urgent issues.

Arti Hurria of the City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center in Duarte, Calif., and colleagues have devised and tested a tool for determining chemotherapy tolerance in older patients. “It’s 11 questions and it’s not hard to do,” says Hurria, who just completed a two-year term as president of the International Society of Geriatric Oncology.

The questions and the scoring for each response appear below.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Risk Factor

Score

Age 72 or greater

2

Cancer type: gastrointestinal or genitourinary

2

Chemotherapy dosing: standard dose

2

More than one chemotherapy drug

2

Hemoglobin less than 11 grams per deciliter for males or less than 10 grams per deciliter for females

3

Creatine clearance (Jelliffe formula—ideal weight): less than 34 milliliters per minute

3

Hearing: described as fair or worse

2

Number of falls in past six months: one or more

3

Needs assistance with taking medications

1

Limited in walking one block

2

Decreased social activity because of physical or emotional health

1


A score of 0 to 5 means the patient has a low risk of experiencing severe toxicity from chemotherapy, 6 to 9 indicates about a 50 percent risk and 10 to 19 indicates a high risk of developing a severe or even fatal reaction to chemotherapy.

To learn more about the research behind this 11-question survey, click here.

A more detailed geriatric assessment can be found here, courtesy of the Cancer and Aging Research Group.

Source: "Predicting Chemotherapy Toxicity in Older Adults with Cancer: A Prospective Multicenter Study," by Arti Hurria et al in Journal of Clinical Oncology; Vol. 29, Issue 25, pages 3457–346. September 1, 2011.

Christine Gorman is a health and science writer.

More by Christine Gorman
Scientific American Magazine Vol 311 Issue 6This article was published with the title “Survey Predicts Tolerance to Chemotherapy for Older Patients” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 311 No. 6 ()
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican122014-6nNrVgCuUxWwAfhFbJWl4h

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe