Soils May Amplify Warming Power of Greenhouse Gases

Soil microbes may release even more greenhouse gases

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Soil microorganisms absorb carbon dioxide only to convert it into much more potent greenhouse gases, negating almost 17 percent of the Earth's ability to absorb heat-trapping emissions, a new study suggests.

The study, published in this week's issue of Nature, measured the release of methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O) gases from soils in forests, grasslands, wetlands and agricultural fields, including rice paddies. Although less abundant than carbon dioxide, these two greenhouse gases have about 30 and 400 times the heat-trapping power of CO2, respectively.

"It reminds us that there are many dimensions of soil as a carbon sink," said Bruce Hungate, co-author of the study and a professor of ecosystem ecology at Northern Arizona University. Kees Jan van Groenigen of Trinity College in Ireland and Craig Osenberg of the University of Florida co-authored the paper.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


To obtain their energy, soil microbes take in carbon dioxide and emit methane and nitrous oxide. As the atmospheric concentration of carbon is expected to increase in the coming years, the output of CH4 and N2O will greatly accelerate the rate of warming, conclude the authors.

Overall, the methane and nitrous oxide released from methanogens and denitrifiers -- the types of microbes that emit the gases -- canceled out 16.6 percent of the global terrestrial carbon sink, the carbon sequestration area that does not include bodies of water.

Recreating the high-CO2 environment forecast for the next 50 to 100 years, the researchers found that higher concentrations of carbon stimulated overall emissions of N2O by 18.8 percent and wetlands-based emissions of methane by 13.2 percent, compared to current atmospheric levels of CO2. In rice paddies, methane emissions increased by 43.4 percent.

Soiled potential?
The study brings into question the carbon-mitigating qualities of soils, which many have considered a promising option for canceling out carbon emissions and as possible tender for carbon credits.

"Sometimes we operate with blinders on," said Hungate about the rush to center carbon mitigation projects around soil. "We should take a holistic approach, not just focus on carbon."

Carbon sequestration from soils has been touted as an important method for climate change mitigation, and was included in the Clean Development Mechanism methodology for agroforestry, the guidelines for carbon crediting under the Kyoto Protocol, said Steven Shonts of forestry and land-based asset management company CINCS. Shonts authored the recently released report "Soil Carbon Sequestration: An Overlooked Opportunity for REDD+."

Hungate noted that his research was limited by a lack of prior research on global change experiments in tropical ecosystems.

"We need global change experiments in the tropics and emissions [studies] in the global ecosystem," he said. "We have a reason to believe it might be large, but there is no standard to test that hypothesis."

Reprinted from Climatewire with permission from Environment & Energy Publishing, LLC. www.eenews.net, 202-628-6500

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe