New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Soils May Amplify Warming Power of Greenhouse Gases

Soil microbes may release even more greenhouse gases

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Soil microorganisms absorb carbon dioxide only to convert it into much more potent greenhouse gases, negating almost 17 percent of the Earth's ability to absorb heat-trapping emissions, a new study suggests.

The study, published in this week's issue of Nature, measured the release of methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O) gases from soils in forests, grasslands, wetlands and agricultural fields, including rice paddies. Although less abundant than carbon dioxide, these two greenhouse gases have about 30 and 400 times the heat-trapping power of CO2, respectively.

"It reminds us that there are many dimensions of soil as a carbon sink," said Bruce Hungate, co-author of the study and a professor of ecosystem ecology at Northern Arizona University. Kees Jan van Groenigen of Trinity College in Ireland and Craig Osenberg of the University of Florida co-authored the paper.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


To obtain their energy, soil microbes take in carbon dioxide and emit methane and nitrous oxide. As the atmospheric concentration of carbon is expected to increase in the coming years, the output of CH4 and N2O will greatly accelerate the rate of warming, conclude the authors.

Overall, the methane and nitrous oxide released from methanogens and denitrifiers -- the types of microbes that emit the gases -- canceled out 16.6 percent of the global terrestrial carbon sink, the carbon sequestration area that does not include bodies of water.

Recreating the high-CO2 environment forecast for the next 50 to 100 years, the researchers found that higher concentrations of carbon stimulated overall emissions of N2O by 18.8 percent and wetlands-based emissions of methane by 13.2 percent, compared to current atmospheric levels of CO2. In rice paddies, methane emissions increased by 43.4 percent.

Soiled potential?
The study brings into question the carbon-mitigating qualities of soils, which many have considered a promising option for canceling out carbon emissions and as possible tender for carbon credits.

"Sometimes we operate with blinders on," said Hungate about the rush to center carbon mitigation projects around soil. "We should take a holistic approach, not just focus on carbon."

Carbon sequestration from soils has been touted as an important method for climate change mitigation, and was included in the Clean Development Mechanism methodology for agroforestry, the guidelines for carbon crediting under the Kyoto Protocol, said Steven Shonts of forestry and land-based asset management company CINCS. Shonts authored the recently released report "Soil Carbon Sequestration: An Overlooked Opportunity for REDD+."

Hungate noted that his research was limited by a lack of prior research on global change experiments in tropical ecosystems.

"We need global change experiments in the tropics and emissions [studies] in the global ecosystem," he said. "We have a reason to believe it might be large, but there is no standard to test that hypothesis."

Reprinted from Climatewire with permission from Environment & Energy Publishing, LLC. www.eenews.net, 202-628-6500

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe