Solid Nitrogen Fuel Could Lighten Rocket Load

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

To escape the earth's atmosphere, rockets need a lot of fuel. So much, in fact, that much of the volume of current models is devoted to carrying it. If scientists could succeed in synthesizing more efficient propellants, it could lead to smaller spacecraft. To that end, a report published in the current issue of the journal Physical Chemistry A may help. The findings suggest that the production of a solid form of nitrogen that packs twice the energy punch of current space propellants is feasible.

Rodney J. Bartlett and his colleagues at the University of Florida ran computer simulations to investigate the properties of a new form of nitrogen known as N₅⁺N₅^-. An ionic bond between a negatively charged group of five nitrogen atoms and a second group of positively charged ones holds the compound together, making it a solid crystalline salt. The positively charged half of N₅⁺N₅^- has been manufactured in a lab, but N₅^- so far remains in the realm of conjecture.

The Florida team posits that N₅^- should form a ring of five nitrogen atoms that share the negative charge equally among themselves. Their calculations further indicate that it should be stable enough to manufacture it experimentally, though the effects of the crystal's framework on the stability of the molecule remain unsolved. According to the report, N₅⁺N₅^- could release a comparable amount of energy per gram as hydrazine, a liquid comprised of hydrogen and nitrogen that powers many current spacecraft. But because the density of the solid fuel is calculated to be twice that of hydrazine, only half the volume would be required to carry it, "which might allow for smaller and therefore lighter rockets."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American