Solitary Briny Confinement

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In these days of pandemic anxiety, envy the Caribbean spiny lobster's ability to avoid sick cohorts. Marine biologists had noticed that in this typically social crustacean, sickly looking lobsters, infected with a lethal and contagious virus called PaV1, usually become isolated from the pack. To determine if the avoidance is purposeful, scientists set up two adjacent dens in a tank of seawater, tied either a sick or healthy lobster in one den and then introduced a second lobster. If the second creature was already infected, it bunked with its sick or healthy tank-mate equally often. But healthy lobsters were one fourth as likely to share dens with infected lobsters than with healthy ones—even before the sickies became contagious—probably because of chemical signals. The result marks the first observation of wild social animals avoiding diseased individuals, the researchers write in the May 25 Nature.

JR Minkel was a news reporter for Scientific American.

More by JR Minkel
Scientific American Magazine Vol 295 Issue 2This article was published with the title “Solitary Briny Confinement” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 295 No. 2 (), p. 30
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0806-30d

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe