Something, Um, Unexpected

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Words like “um” and “er” tend to have a bad reputation, but a new study suggests that they might actually do listeners a favor.

Researchers at the University of Edinburgh and the University of Stirling in the U.K. measured brain activity to assess listeners’ understanding. Immediately after a person hears words, brain activity spikes downward. In the study, the larger the spike, the more difficult it was for the listener to put the words into context.

The scientists measured these spikes in 12 people after they heard four combinations of sentences: with either predictable or unpredictable target words at the end and with or without “er” uttered right before the target. They found that an “er”—especially when heard before an unpredictable word—shrunk the brain activity spikes of listeners, suggesting this syllable helped subjects place words in context more easily.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Afterward, the scientists tested the subjects to see which target words they remembered best. “Words that were preceded by this disfluency were more likely to be accurately recognized later,” says Martin Corley, a professor at Edinburgh and one of the study's authors. Although the scientists are not sure why the “er” aids listener comprehension and memory, it may warn listeners that something unexpected is coming up.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe