New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Something, Um, Unexpected

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Words like “um” and “er” tend to have a bad reputation, but a new study suggests that they might actually do listeners a favor.

Researchers at the University of Edinburgh and the University of Stirling in the U.K. measured brain activity to assess listeners’ understanding. Immediately after a person hears words, brain activity spikes downward. In the study, the larger the spike, the more difficult it was for the listener to put the words into context.

The scientists measured these spikes in 12 people after they heard four combinations of sentences: with either predictable or unpredictable target words at the end and with or without “er” uttered right before the target. They found that an “er”—especially when heard before an unpredictable word—shrunk the brain activity spikes of listeners, suggesting this syllable helped subjects place words in context more easily.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Afterward, the scientists tested the subjects to see which target words they remembered best. “Words that were preceded by this disfluency were more likely to be accurately recognized later,” says Martin Corley, a professor at Edinburgh and one of the study's authors. Although the scientists are not sure why the “er” aids listener comprehension and memory, it may warn listeners that something unexpected is coming up.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe