New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Squeaky Mice Reveal Emotion, Self-Expression in the Brain

Mice sing complex ultrasonic songs that gives researchers clues to the genetic roots of pleasure

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The squeak of a mouse tells most people to buy a mousetrap, but it tells some researchers a lot more. According to an April 1 study in PLoS ONE, mouse noises indicate certain states of mind, and monitoring their sounds can help scientists learn more about emotion, reward seeking and communication.

In addition to audible squeaks, mice produce ultrasonic noises—squeaks so high that humans cannot hear them. Males sing a complex song during sex and squeak when they are tickled, females chirp when around other females, and mouse pups squeak when their mothers abandon them. These vocalizations transform as the situation changes, too—male mice squeak more frequently as they get closer to ejaculation, and female mice make a ruckus when their female playmates have chocolate on their breath. Scientists at the University of Toronto, Northwestern University and the National Institutes of Health speculated that these noises and their intensities were linked to the activa­tion of dopamine, a brain chemi­cal involved in pleasure and reward seeking. They bred mice to lack certain aspects of dopamine function and monitored the resulting din. Sure enough, the dopamine-deprived mice were quieter on all counts, suggesting that mouse squeaks relate both to the experience of pleasure and to the desire for it.

The specially bred mice can teach scientists much about both mouse behavior and the human brain. “Because mouse genes are so similar to many human genes, it gives you a way of studying the genes for complex behaviors,” says John Yeomans, a psychologist at the University of Toronto and the lead researcher of the study. Labs are already starting to use mouse noises to study language development, social bonding and diseases that have symptoms related to communication, including schizophre­nia and autism.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Editor's Note: This story was originally printed with the title "Song of the Mouse"

SA Mind Vol 19 Issue 4This article was published with the title “Squeaky Mice Reveal Emotion, Self-Expression in the Brain” in SA Mind Vol. 19 No. 4 (), p. 10
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind0808-10a

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe