Sorta Superfluid

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The discovery that helium-3 at extremely low temperatures could become, like helium-4, a superfluid--having no viscosity whatsoever--earned David Lee and Robert Richardson of Cornell University and Douglas Osheroff of Stanford University a 1996 Nobel prize. But in fact, studying this wondrous substance since then has proved a bit tricky. Helium-4 becomes superfluid when pairs of its atoms condense into a coherent quantum state. (As such, with no resistance to flow, the fluid can pass where even a gas cannot.) Although helium-3 does the same, its atomic couples are magnetic, adding complications.

Scientists have typically examined the interactions between such helium-3 atoms by first putting fluid samples into aerogel--a superlight solid comprised of skinny silicon columns. The result is that the temperature at which this dirty helium-3 becomes superfluid drops. But researchers at the National Center for Scientific Research in Grenoble, France, report in the October 16 issue of Physical Review Letters that helium-3 acts somewhat superfluid at temperatures in between its normal and aerogel-influenced transition points. They studied the helium using nuclear magnetic resonance and suggest that perhaps the behavior of the atoms at these intermediate temperatures represents a new kind of superfluidity--a state in which four helium-3 atoms are joined instead of two.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe