New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Sound of Breaking Waves Determined by Distribution of Bubbles Inside

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The sound of waves lapping the shore tends to have a calming effect. But the source of the surf's noise is by no means tranquil. As a wave breaks, dense plumes of tiny bubbles form within the surface water. It is the size distribution of these air bubbles, researchers report today in the journal Nature, that determines what a wave sounds like. Because the bubbles' proportions also affect climate-influencing processes such as gas exchange between the ocean and the air, the findings could help scientists produce better climate models.

The fate of bubbles within waves tens to hundreds of seconds after their formation is quite well understood. But Grant D. Deane and M. Dale Stokes of the Scripps Institution of Oceanography in California wanted to know what was happening in the immediate aftermath of wave breaking. Using a specially designed BubbleCam to document the laboratory tank waves and their open-ocean counterparts as they broke (see image), the scientists counted the bubbles and categorized them according to size. They determined that the distribution of small bubbles (less than one millimeter across) differed from that of large ones (greater than one millimeter across). Because the two classes do not behave the same way, the scientists posit that they are created by separate processes. When a wave curls over itself (which creates the tube favored by surfers) big bubbles form. Smaller bubbles, in contrast, arise from the splash that occurs when the wave's tip collides with the wave face. "On the surface, breaking waves seem to be very complicated," Deane says. "But underneath there is a very appealing and simple process driving this."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe