Sound of Breaking Waves Determined by Distribution of Bubbles Inside

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The sound of waves lapping the shore tends to have a calming effect. But the source of the surf's noise is by no means tranquil. As a wave breaks, dense plumes of tiny bubbles form within the surface water. It is the size distribution of these air bubbles, researchers report today in the journal Nature, that determines what a wave sounds like. Because the bubbles' proportions also affect climate-influencing processes such as gas exchange between the ocean and the air, the findings could help scientists produce better climate models.

The fate of bubbles within waves tens to hundreds of seconds after their formation is quite well understood. But Grant D. Deane and M. Dale Stokes of the Scripps Institution of Oceanography in California wanted to know what was happening in the immediate aftermath of wave breaking. Using a specially designed BubbleCam to document the laboratory tank waves and their open-ocean counterparts as they broke (see image), the scientists counted the bubbles and categorized them according to size. They determined that the distribution of small bubbles (less than one millimeter across) differed from that of large ones (greater than one millimeter across). Because the two classes do not behave the same way, the scientists posit that they are created by separate processes. When a wave curls over itself (which creates the tube favored by surfers) big bubbles form. Smaller bubbles, in contrast, arise from the splash that occurs when the wave's tip collides with the wave face. "On the surface, breaking waves seem to be very complicated," Deane says. "But underneath there is a very appealing and simple process driving this."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe