South America's Glaciers Thinning Quickly

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The glaciers of South America are thinning twice as fast as they were a few decades ago, researchers report. As a result, the ice fields of Patagonia are contributing excessive amounts of water to the world's oceans as compared to larger icefields located elsewhere. The findings are published today in the journal Science.

All told, the Patagonia glaciers in Chile and Argentina cover 90,000 square kilometers. Eric Rignot of the California Institute of Technology and his colleagues analyzed radar topographic maps, aerial photography and traditional cartographic surveys for 63 of the largest icefields between 1968 to 2000. They determined that during the time period between 1995 and 2000, the ice was thinning at a rate equivalent to a sea level rise of 0.105 millimeters a year whereas the data from 1968 to 1995 indicates a thinning rate of only 0.042 millimeters a year. The recent data accounts for 9 percent of the annual sea level rise attributed to mountain glaciers. Alaska's glaciers, in contrast, are five times larger than the Patagonia fields and account for 30 percent of glacier melt's contribution to sea level rise. "The contribution of Patagonia to sea level rise is therefore disproportionately larger (by a factor of 1.5) than is indicated by its area," the authors conclude.

The scientists report that warmer air temperatures and lower precipitation levels cannot explain the increased rate of disappearance for Patagonia's glaciers. Instead, they suggest that ice dynamics, including pieces breaking off into oceans or lakes in a process known as calving, are responsible for part of the thinning.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe