Space Age Wasteland: Debris in Orbit Is Here to Stay

Even without future launches, low Earth orbit will remain polluted

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Space may be incomprehensibly vast, but Earth’s environs are crowded with junk. Spent rockets, derelict spacecraft, satellite fragments and loose hardware now form a cloud of debris that poses a threat to orbiting satellites and astronauts. Sky watchers have catalogued more than 16,000 objects larger than about 10 centimeters, most of them in low Earth orbit, at altitudes of 200 to 2,000 kilometers.

And the junk is self-sustaining. If humankind were to cease all spacefaring activities, the hardware we have already cast off would continue to collide and fragment into bits for centuries. Maintaining current launch rates would make the problem even worse. The number of space objects has shot up in the past five years because of China’s 2007 test of an antisatellite weapon and the 2009 crash between Russian and U.S. satellites. Governments are contemplating cleanup measures but have yet to devise a workable solution.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Credit: Jan Willem Tulp, Sources: Ting Wang Stanford University (2012 debris data); J.C. Liou NASA Orbital Debris Program Office (future projections)

John Matson is a former reporter and editor for Scientific American who has written extensively about astronomy and physics.

More by John Matson
Scientific American Magazine Vol 306 Issue 4This article was published with the title “Space Age Wasteland: Debris in Orbit Is Here to Stay” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 306 No. 4 ()
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican042012-1fnnCL0gWK5NNJuY5cYpdD

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe