Space Shuttle Backgrounder

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

By all accounts, NASA's long-awaited return to flight has not gone as smoothly as hoped. Shortly after Tuesday's launch of the space shuttle Discovery--the first since the Columbia shuttle's re-entry disaster in February of 2003--large chunks of insulation foam from the external fuel tank broke off and hit the wing. Discovery appears to have emerged from the event without significant damage, but the same problem was responsible for the Columbia accident. The incident comes as a blow to the agency, which has invested nearly a billion dollars and two and a half years of work to make the shuttles safer following the failure of Columbia. In response, NASA has again grounded the shuttle fleet until engineers figure out how to avoid a repeat of the foam shedding. Meanwhile, Discovery has docked successfully with the International Space Station, to which the crew is delivering some 15 tons of supplies.

Exactly what impact the debris issue will have on the future of the shuttle program remains to be seen. In hopes that Scientific American's past coverage relating to this topic will give readers some context for this developing story, we have compiled a list of stories below.



On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Free preview. Full coverage available from Scientific American Digital

07/04/2005
Feeling the Pinch

06/27/2005
Lost in Space

12/27/2004
A Bad Fix for Hubble?

10/01/2004
Readying for a Relaunch

04/05/2004
Fly Me to the Moon

04/01/2004
SA Perspectives: Breaking Out of Orbit

08/01/2003
SA Perspectives: Houston, You Have a Problem

04/01/2003
Rethinking the Shuttle

02/07/2003
The Cold Odds against Columbia

02/04/2003
Space Shuttle Investigation Continues

05/27/2002
Lost in Space

04/30/2002
Has the Space Age Stalled?

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe