Space Shuttle Investigation Continues

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

The inquiry into the space shuttle Columbia tragedy continues, with thousands of pieces of debris so far reported to authorities from locations ranging from central Texas to western Louisiana. Each fragment will help investigators piece together what went wrong on the shuttle's return to Earth Saturday morning, under what were arguably perfect weather conditions for landing.

The first indications of trouble reached NASA's mission control eight minutes before nine o'clock EST, when sensors on the left side of Columbia's fuselage recorded a temperature spike. A few minutes later, temperature increases totaling 60 degrees were detected on the left side of the shuttle, which was significantly greater than the increase recorded on the right. Minutes later the control system started to tilt Columbia, apparently in response to increased drag detected on the shuttle's left. The anomalous data from the left side drew attention to an incident that occurred during the shuttle's launch: a piece of foam insulation from the external fuel tank hit Columbia's left wing about 80 seconds after lift-off. A leading theory holds that the impact of the roughly 2.7-pound block may have damaged the shuttle's heat-resistant tiles.

"All the analysis that we conducted over the course of the 16-day mission led us to conclude that there were no 'safety of operations' considerations and that's what the flight engineers all determined during the course of that time," says NASA Administrator Sean O'Keefe. "Having said that, we are not ruling this out. The investigating team is looking at that theory as well as lots of others." In addition to NASA's internal review panel, an independent inquiry board has been appointed to look into the disaster. In the meantime, all shuttle plans have been shelved. After the 1986 Challenger explosion, it was more than two years before another space shuttle took off.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American