New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Space Wars: The Players, The Drawbacks, The Aftermath

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

THE PLAYERS:
Since the start of the space age, the list of countries, multinational entities and private commercial consortia that have demonstrated an ability to launch satellites into orbit—and thus potentially to shoot one down—has grown long. The chief worry among observers is that any effort by the U.S. to develop orbital weapons would drive the People’s Republic of China, the Russian Federation and others to join in a costly arms race in space.

Demonstrated Ground-Based Antisatellite Weapons
China, Russia, U.S.

Attained Geostationary Orbit (36,000 km above Earth)
European Space Agency (Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, U.K.), France, International Launch Services (Russia, U.S.), Japan, Sea Launch (Norway, Russia, U.S.)


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Attained only Low Earth Orbit (between 100 and 2,000 km above Earth)
India, Israel, Pakistan, Ukraine

THE CASE AGAINST

1. All satellites and space-based weapons are likely to remain highly vulnerableto attack.

2. Developing advanced antisatellite weapons will probably trigger a new international arms race.

3. The cost of space weaponry is huge.

4. Testing and using space weapons could leave enormous quantities of debris in orbit that would threaten all satellites and crewed spacecraft.

THE AFTERMATH When the Dust Won’t Clear
A military conflict in space could release an enveloping cloud of debris that could damage or destroy satellites and crewed spacecraft that circle the globe. At orbital speeds, even minuscule objects could deeply penetrate a vehicle and wreck vital equipment (far right). The results of a nuclear detonation in space could be even worse: the electromagnetic pulse and blast of charged particles would degrade all but the most heavily shielded electronics systems in orbit. Space war could push the world economy back into the 1950s, as communications, navigation, weather and other advanced satellite services would be rendered impractical for years to come.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe