New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Spam Hits Lowest Point Since 2008

The decrease may be a result of recent takedowns of two botnets disarmed by the FBI earlier this year

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Global spam levels have dropped to their lowest point in three years, and now make up just 70.5 percent of all emails, according to Symantec's new Intelligence Report.

This is a significant decline from July 2010, when Symantec detected 230 billion spam messages in daily circulation, a number that accounted for 90 percent of all global email. It is the lowest recorded spam level since November 2008, when spam made up 68 percent of all emails, Symantec said in its report.

Pharmaceutical spam, a mainstay of spammers' arsenals, has also fallen off; although it is still the most common category, it accounts now for 35.5 percent of spam compared with the end of last year, when it made up 64.2 percent of spam emails. Other top spam categories include watches and jewelry, adult/sex/dating, weight loss and casino/gambling.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Symantec's report suggested that the decrease in spam volume may be a result of the recent takedowns of the Rustock and Coreflood botnets, massive international networks of spam-spewing computers that the FBI disarmed earlier this year.

While it's refreshing to receive fewer spam messages, targeted malware attacks and advanced persistent threats (APT) are both on the rise. This could speak to a dangerous trend of cybercriminals targeting specific companies' intellectual property rather than blanketing the Web with spam.

"Targeted malware in general has grown in volume and complexity in recent years, but as it is designed to steal company secrets, it can be very difficult for recipients to recognize," the report explained.

Targeted attacks are still rare — one in 255 emails contained malware, but only one in 8,300 were "actual highly targeted attacks that could lead to an ATP," Symantec said. Even so, the statistics show that these types of cyberattacks have jumped fourfold since January.

To protect your personal information from identity thieves and spammers, make sure you run anti-virus software on your computer, encrypt your sensitive data, especially on removable USB drives, and use a strong password as your first line of defense.

From SecurityNewsDaily (find the original story here); reprinted with permission.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe