Specially Shaped Artificial Particles Detoxify Blood

Camouflaged nanoparticles can soak up toxins like red bloods cells do 

Thomas Fuchs

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Red blood cells are not just vehicles that transport oxygen in our bodies: they also clear harmful substances from the bloodstream. Scientists at Johns Hopkins University recently investigated how synthetic biomimicking (or “biomimetic”) nanoparticles, masquerading as red blood cells, can best pull off the same feat in mice. They found that molding these impostors into nonspherical shapes before disguising them improved performance.

Previous work had shown that coating synthetic nanoparticles in membranes borrowed from real red blood cells lets the particles act like cleansing sponges. “By injecting a lot of these particles into the blood, we create decoys that soak up the toxins [so] there's less harm to healthy cells,” says Jordan Green, a biomedical engineer at Johns Hopkins and senior author on a new study of the technique, published in April in Science Advances.

The researchers first manufactured spherical nanoparticles from a biodegradable polymer that is known to be safe and is widely used in therapeutic devices. They then stretched the particles into shapes resembling tiny, flattened Frisbees and elongated footballs. Finally, they wrapped some of each shape in the membranes, which they stripped from mouse red blood cells.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The team had hypothesized that nanoparticles shaped like disks—as real red blood cells are—would better absorb toxins because of their increased surface area. To test which shape worked best, the researchers injected each variety into mice that had been exposed to a typically lethal dose of toxin from Staphylococcusaureus bacteria. Green and his colleagues report that the football-shaped, membrane-coated particles survived the longest before being cleared by the immune system—almost seven times longer than uncoated spheres. Mice treated with spherical particles, even coated ones, did not live much longer than those left untreated. But a third of the mice treated with coated Frisbee-shaped particles, and half of those treated with coated football-shaped ones, were alive and healthy a week later.

Green notes that even though the Frisbee-shaped particles matched red blood cells' shape more closely, the football-shaped ones worked better. “It tells us that there are other things the disk shapes didn't mimic, including the elasticity of [red blood cells] that deform as they flow,” he says. He adds that the football-shaped ones most likely move through the blood more easily.

Other studies “have found that [nonspherical] shapes and biomimetic membrane coatings could, separately, enhance the lifetime of synthetic particles in the bloodstream,” says Dyche Mullins, a cellular and molecular pharmacologist at the University of California, San Francisco, who was not involved in the research. But “this study now demonstrates a synergy between the two effects.”

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe