Sperm grown in a test tube

Immature mouse testicles yield fully developed sperm in culture.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

By Janelle Weaver

Researchers in Japan have made fertile mammalian sperm in a culture dish, a feat long thought to be impossible. The technique, reported March 23 in Nature, could help to reveal the molecular steps involved in sperm formation and might even lead to treatments for male infertility.

Biologists have been trying to make sperm outside the body for almost a century. Failure has often struck at the stage of meiosis, a type of cell division during which paired chromosomes swap DNA and the number of chromosomes per cell is halved. The result of this process is sperm cells ready to fuse with an egg.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Takehiko Ogawa and colleagues at Yokohama City University discovered that the key to getting sperm through meiosis lay in a simple change to standard culture conditions.

"The report is quite exciting because it represents the fulfilment of a goal held by many reproductive biologists over many years," says Mary Ann Handel, an expert in reproductive genetics at the Jackson Laboratory in Bar Harbor, Maine.

Culture shock

By trial and error, Ogawa's team worked out which culture methods allowed sperm in tissue fragments from neonatal mouse testes to mature. To track sperm development, they used a fluorescent protein that marked cells undergoing--or that had undergone--meiosis.

Initially, the researchers placed the fragments on a gel and soaked them in fetal bovine serum, a typical ingredient of cell cultures. But nothing they added to this mix worked, not even factors known to stimulate sperm maturation.

The authors' success came when they replaced the fetal bovine serum with a serum-free medium, KnockOut Serum Replacement, which is often used to grow embryonic stem cells.

After several weeks of bathing in this mixture, almost all tissue samples contained some cells with the same number of chromosomes found in sperm. Nearly half of the samples contained cells with flagella, tail-like projections that sperm use to swim. Sperm formation peaked after about a month, although it lasted for more than two months.

The researchers injected the sperm into egg cells. A few weeks later, surrogates delivered a dozen live, fertile offspring. The team also grew sperm from neonatal testis tissue that had been frozen for days or weeks.

Matter of time

Ali Honaramooz, a reproductive biologist at the University of Saskatchewan in Saskatoon, Canada, says that the technique could aid prepubescent boys about to undergo cancer therapies that destroy fertility. It could also protect the reproductive potential of endangered animals that might die before reaching sexual maturity, he adds.

The procedure will also be useful for studying the molecular events that underlie sperm production, says Martin Dym, a cell biologist at Georgetown University in Washington, D.C. But before the technique can be used in treatments for male infertility, researchers will have to generate millions of sperm cells and translate the work to humans, Dym adds.

Honaramooz says that is just a matter of time. "If the same methodology can be applied, with many minor changes, to other species, that's great," He says. "If not, then it would take almost the same amount of work, but at least now you know that eventually it's going to work."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe