New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Sphere Made to Redefine Kilogram Has Purest Silicon Ever Created

New measure, to take effect in 2018, relies on crystal that is free of impurities

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The perfect sphere that will be used to redefine the kilogram in terms of the Planck constant in 2018 has been shown to consist of the purest silicon ever made.

The kilogram is the only unit still based on a physical object. The ‘big k’ is a platinum–iridium cylinder stored in an underground vault in France. However, over time this artefact can gain or lose atoms, which is why the International Committee for Weights and Measures decided to redefine the unit using the Planck constant. This fundamental physical constant relates to mass through Einstein’s formula E = mc2.

One way to calculate Planck’s constant involves determining Avogadro’s constant, the number of particles in a given amount of a substance. To do this, scientists will calculate the atoms in a silicon sphere—but this only works if the crystal is free of impurities.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Researchers at the National Institute for Metrology Research, Italy, and the Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation checked a sample of the sphere for 65 elemental impurities using neutron activation analysis. This bombards the sample with neutrons, which causes atoms to form radioactive isotopes. As each element has a particular decay path, neutron activation analysis can determine the nature and amount of each element within the sample.

The ‘largest’ impurity the team found was copper—approximately 70 nanograms per gram of sample. This adds up to about one copper atom for every three billion silicon atoms. Other elements were found in even tinier amounts—picograms to femtograms per gram of silicon—including chromium, cobalt, gallium, arsenic, bromine, lanthanum, tungsten and gold. The researchers found no traces of any of the other elements, down to their detection limits.

With all the impurities accounted for, 1kg of the material would weigh 0.7μg less than it should if every atom were silicon. This makes the sphere, which is highly enriched in the element’s most abundant isotope silicon-28, even purer than a previously made orb used for the latest determination of the Avogadro constant.

This article is reproduced with permission from Chemistry World. The article was first published on June 18, 2017.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe