On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
If you hear that a sea creature splits after sensing a foe, that may not be just a figure of speech for it swimming away—it may literally split in two. That is the case for the sand dollar (Dendraster excentricus), a spiny critter related to starfish. When the larvae detect mucus from nearby predatory fish, they start cloning themselves, asexually reproducing within 24 hours. Although cloning is slow compared with a fish attack, if the larvae get enough of a head start, it may boost their chances of evading detection. That is because the clones are about two-thirds the typical length of the original. Many animals clone themselves, but scientists thought that the process was generally driven solely by growth and reproduction, not by a need to defend against carnivores. The scientists, who published their findings in the March 14 Science, speculate that cloning in response to predators may be found where small size confers a safety advantage.
Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism
Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.
When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.
Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber
