Squawking Birds Give Away Their Nest Sizes

How to count seabirds on islands using sound

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

One of the most basic field research techniques in bird conservation is counting birds and their nests. Tallying songbirds in a suburban garden is one thing; spotting seabirds is another. Seabirds, which reflect the health of their marine ecosystems, often build their nests in inaccessible areas—wedged into vertical cliffs or on remote islands battered by intense waves. Many lay their eggs in burrows more than a meter deep to protect them from weather. And on top of that, most are nocturnal, making them hard to see even in plain sight.

“There is a vast number of shearwater and petrel colonies for which we have absolutely no idea whether there are hundreds of pairs, or thousands, or tens of thousands,” says Steffen Oppel of the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds. So Oppel and his colleagues have come up with a new method for monitoring the populations without being able to see them: they listen.

Oppel and his team found that they could use audio recordings to estimate a bird's population size after testing the method on a raucous colony of Cory's shearwaters that breeds on a small island in the Azores called Corvo. They describe their findings in the journal Nature Conservation. By combining acoustic data from nine microphones placed around Corvo with information about nest density, the researchers developed an algorithm that took terabytes of audio recordings and automatically counted the number of individual calls. They found, as expected, that more nests meant louder recordings and more calls. That correlation enabled them to extrapolate an estimate for the seabird population for the entire island—6,000 breeding pairs—something that in the past has been little more than a simple guess.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Even if the estimate is off somewhat, Oppel's method will be useful for detecting increases or decreases in populations over time. From that, scientists can infer the health of the seabirds' food chains as well as observe how rookeries are faring in the face of invasive predators and climate change.

Jason G. Goldman is a science journalist based in Los Angeles. He has written about animal behavior, wildlife biology, conservation, and ecology for Scientific American, Los Angeles magazine, the Washington Post, the Guardian, the BBC, Conservation magazine, and elsewhere. He contributes to Scientific American's "60-Second Science" podcast, and is co-editor of Science Blogging: The Essential Guide (Yale University Press). He enjoys sharing his wildlife knowledge on television and on the radio, and often speaks to the public about wildlife and science communication.

More by Jason G. Goldman
Scientific American Magazine Vol 311 Issue 1This article was published with the title “Census for the Birds” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 311 No. 1 (), p. 20
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0714-20a

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe