Star 'Heartbeats' Help Stir up Galaxies

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

New computer simulations may help astronomers better explain the slow pace of star formation. According to a study to be published in the November 20 issue of Astrophysical Journal Letters, periodic heating of interstellar gas by ultraviolet radiation could keep the gas agitated enough to prevent its condensation into stars.

Scientists have known for years that turbulence within the gaseous clouds found throughout the Milky Way stymies star formation. But some of the forces behind this disturbance remain unknown. Building on previous work that reported large stars generate huge bursts of radiation every 10 million years or so, Alexei G. Kritsuk and Michael L. Norman of the University of California at San Diego used supercomputer simulations to investigate the potential effects of this energy source. "We think this radiation may act as an important regulation mechanism, providing a feedback effect from star-formation that may inhibit further star formation," Norman says. The researchers found that ultraviolet radiation in a large section of the Milky Way galaxy first doubles and then increases by nearly 10 times before decreasing again. (The image shows ultraviolet heating in a cube of interstellar medium.) The pattern repeats like a heartbeat, the scientists report. According to Kritsuk, such time-dependent heating of the interstellar medium could be a driving force behind the "filaments and blobby sheets of gas actually observed by astronomers in the regions of the galaxy where background ultraviolet radiation is the main source of energy."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American