New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Star 'Heartbeats' Help Stir up Galaxies

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


New computer simulations may help astronomers better explain the slow pace of star formation. According to a study to be published in the November 20 issue of Astrophysical Journal Letters, periodic heating of interstellar gas by ultraviolet radiation could keep the gas agitated enough to prevent its condensation into stars.

Scientists have known for years that turbulence within the gaseous clouds found throughout the Milky Way stymies star formation. But some of the forces behind this disturbance remain unknown. Building on previous work that reported large stars generate huge bursts of radiation every 10 million years or so, Alexei G. Kritsuk and Michael L. Norman of the University of California at San Diego used supercomputer simulations to investigate the potential effects of this energy source. "We think this radiation may act as an important regulation mechanism, providing a feedback effect from star-formation that may inhibit further star formation," Norman says. The researchers found that ultraviolet radiation in a large section of the Milky Way galaxy first doubles and then increases by nearly 10 times before decreasing again. (The image shows ultraviolet heating in a cube of interstellar medium.) The pattern repeats like a heartbeat, the scientists report. According to Kritsuk, such time-dependent heating of the interstellar medium could be a driving force behind the "filaments and blobby sheets of gas actually observed by astronomers in the regions of the galaxy where background ultraviolet radiation is the main source of energy."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe