Stardust Space Probe Flies By Comet

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The Stardust space probe, the first mission to collect a sample from a body beyond the moon and return it to Earth, has successfully made its close approach to Comet Wild-2. "We¿ve flown through the worst of it, and we¿re still in contact with our spacecraft," says project manager Tom Duxbury of NASA¿s Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL).

Zipping through the comet¿s coma--its dust atmosphere--the probe passed 240 kilometers from the solid body, or nucleus. The close-approach record holder is the European Space Agency¿s Giotto spacecraft, which in 1992 came within 200 kilometers of the nucleus of Comet Grigg-Skjellerup. During the encounter, Stardust deployed a dust collector roughly the size and shape of a large-head tennis racket. The collector will soon be folded into a capsule for the return journey to Earth. In January 2006 the capsule is scheduled to separate from Stardust and land in an air force test range in Utah.

The collected dust, ranging in size from a few to a few hundred microns, is thought to be a piece of the swirling cloud from which the planets emerged. Comets, like asteroids, are planetary building blocks that were never incorporated into planets. In the intervening 4.6 billion years, they languished in the deep freeze of the outer solar system, little changed. By comparison, material on Earth and other planets has been thoroughly reworked by geological processes, erasing the record of the formative early period.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


For those watching the Stardust encounter from mission control, it was a case of no news is good news. Relative to the comet, the space probe was moving at six kilometers per second. Shields--multiple layers of carbon and ceramic sheets--protected the solar panels and main body from damage by colliding dust grains. Stardust did not send images in real time, so all scientists and engineers could do was watch the radio carrier signal to see whether the spacecraft survived the bombardment. The signal from the moment of closest approach was scheduled to reach Earth at 11:44 a.m. Pacific time, and as this time came and went, the carrier held steady. Applause went up in the control room. "We¿ve passed the closest approach without any injury, apparently," says Donald Yeomans, a comet scientist at JPL.

Over the ensuing hours, Stardust transmitted its data back to Earth, including an image taken from about 500 kilometers away. The image shows the nucleus, about five kilometers across, and unlike other cometary nuclei, it seems to be round. Around its edge, scientists have so far counted five jets of outflowing material. The features that look like craters have the wrong proportions to be impact craters. Imaging scientist Ray Newburn of JPL says they are probably sinkholes caused by the loss of material. No such features appear on images of Comet Halley. "These pictures are really going to open up a new window to understanding how comets work," says principal investigator Don Brownlee of the University of Washington.

Stardust is one of the mid-price spacecraft in NASA¿s Discovery program, running $130 million plus launch rocket and operations costs. It was launched in February 1999 and, during its journey, also collected interstellar dust that had infiltrated interplanetary space.

Comet Wild-2 used to orbit beyond the orbit of Jupiter, but it made an unusually close approach to the giant planet in September 1974 and got catapulted into the inner solar system. Since then, the comet has passed near the sun five times--compared to over 100 times for Comet Halley. Consequently, the sun has hardly had a chance to boil off or otherwise alter the cometary material, making Wild-2 an especially pristine sample from the genesis of planets. --George Musser in Pasadena, Calif.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe