Statistics of Food

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In Hunt's Merchant's Magazine for the present month, there are some interesting statistics, from which we cull the following information :— "In the thirty-nine years from 1819 to 1858, the average price of mess beef has been $10 19 per barrel, and mess pork, $14 63. Rice has averaged f 3 67 per 100 lbs, and coffee 10J cents per lb., while tea has main-tained a price of 50 cents per pound. In the United Kingdom, in 1841, there was an average of one pound six ounces of tea, one pound one ounce of coffee, and seventeen pounds of sugar consumed by each individual; while in 1856, there were two pounds four ounces of tea, one pound four ounces of coffee, and twenty-eight pounds two ounces of sugar consumed by each person." We look upon these facts with gladness, because they indicate the replacing of temperate and healthy beverages fo John Bull's well-known drinks, beer and whisky.—EDS.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 13 Issue 21This article was published with the title “Statistics of Food” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 13 No. 21 (), p. 161
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican01301858-161b

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe