Statistics of Population in Scotland

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The returns of births, marriages, and deaths in Scotland for 1857, just published, show that one birth in every 29, one death in every 49, and one marriage in every 143 of its inhabitants has taken place. The birth rate, which was thus, 338 for every 10,000 of the popula- tion in Scotland, was, in the same year, 343 - for every 10,000 in England. So far as a three years' average can determine such a point, it would appear that the mean mortality in Scotland has been in the proportion of 200 deaths to every 10,000 persons living, whereas in England the proportion of deaths during the same year has been 216 to every 10,000 living—producing a deficiency on the part of England of 91,259 lives in the three years. In Scotland, the inhabitants of towns were cut off during the year at the rate of 244 in every 10,000 persons, or one death in every 41; whereas in the rural districts the proportion was only 157 deaths in 10,000 persons, or one death in 63. The proportion of marriages is considerably below the ten years' average in England, the former showing only 69 marriages in every 10,000 persons, and the latter 84. This fact, and the circumstance that the returns show the number of illegitimate births to be greater, would seem to indicate that some causes are in operation which are not favorable to the morals of the population in Scotland.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 13 Issue 39This article was published with the title “Statistics of Population in Scotland” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 13 No. 39 (), p. 307
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican06051858-307

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe